UK Government Asks: Should Bosses Have to Warn Workers Before Installing Tracking Software?
A new consultation wants employers to consult staff before rolling out AI productivity scoring, keystroke logging, and biometric surveillance. Workers in one in three UK organisations are already monitored.

Key points
- The UK Department for Business and Trade launched a public consultation on workplace monitoring technology, open until 30 September 2025.
- One in three UK organisations actively monitored employees' digital activity as of the most recent survey, up from one in five two years earlier.
- Ministers are weighing whether employers should be legally required to consult workers before introducing tracking software.
- The proposed definition of "bossware" covers CCTV, biometrics, keystroke logging, location tracking, and AI-driven performance scoring.
- A mandatory consultation duty could turn any new AI monitoring rollout into a formal HR and legal process, not just an IT decision.
Something quiet may have been watching you at work. Software that counts your keystrokes, scores your productivity using artificial intelligence (AI, the technology that powers tools like ChatGPT and facial recognition), or tracks your location is already running inside a third of UK workplaces. Now the government wants to decide whether employers should have to ask workers first.
The Department for Business and Trade opened a formal consultation this month, as first reported by The Register, asking whether current rules around what it calls workplace monitoring technology (WMT) still fit the modern office. WMT is the official term for any system an employer uses to watch, measure, or make decisions about staff, ranging from CCTV cameras in a warehouse to an algorithm that grades a call-centre worker's performance without a human ever listening in.
What could actually change?
Minsters have not picked a path yet. Three options are on the table. The lightest touch would be voluntary guidance, essentially advice employers could ignore. The middle option is a statutory code of practice, a set of rules with legal weight but not criminal penalties. The strongest option would require employers to formally consult recognised trade unions or elected staff representatives before switching on any new monitoring system.
That third option is the one drawing attention. Stephanie Lees, a data protection specialist at law firm Pinsent Masons, told The Register it would add "a further layer of oversight" for businesses already handling the UK GDPR (the data-protection law that governs how organisations store and use personal information), local employment rules, and the EU AI Act (the European Union's new law regulating how AI systems are built and deployed).
In plain terms: buying a new AI productivity tool could require the same kind of formal staff sign-off as changing a redundancy policy.
What does this mean for workers?
If you are employed in the UK, the consultation matters directly. Under the proposed rules, your employer might have to tell you, and hear your views, before installing software that watches what you type, measures how long you spend idle, or uses an algorithm to rate your output.
The government acknowledges the technology is not inherently bad. Used carefully, it says, monitoring can improve productivity and investment. But it also flags real risks: unjustified surveillance, loss of autonomy, and the possibility that an algorithm makes consequential decisions about your career based on flawed or incomplete data.
The consultation runs until 30 September 2025. If a statutory duty follows, any organisation planning an AI workforce tool will need legal, HR, and IT teams working together from day one.
| Monitoring type | Example |
|---|---|
| Biometric surveillance | Fingerprint clocking-in systems |
| Keystroke logging | Software counting every key pressed |
| Location tracking | GPS on delivery drivers' phones |
| AI productivity scoring | Algorithms rating output without human review |
| CCTV and access control | Door-entry logs, warehouse cameras |
Common questions
Is my employer already allowed to monitor me?
Yes, in most cases, provided they tell you and have a legitimate reason. Current UK law, including GDPR, already sets some limits, but critics say those rules have not kept pace with how sophisticated tracking software has become.
Does this apply to remote workers too?
The consultation covers all workplace monitoring technology, and much of the most intrusive software (screen capture, mouse-movement tracking, productivity dashboards) is aimed squarely at people working from home, so remote workers are very much in scope.
When will new rules actually arrive?
The consultation closes 30 September 2025. After that, ministers will review responses before deciding whether to legislate. Any new law or formal code of practice would take additional months, possibly longer, to come into force.



